Reviewable by design

Benchmarks and readiness

Benchmarks, readiness gates, and architecture you can review.

This page is a quick tour of what exists today: benchmark harnesses, readiness gates, and the perimeter-first control model. No hand-wavy numbers, just concrete capabilities you can inspect.

Benchmarks and performance discipline

  • Storage and data-path benchmarking to validate throughput under realistic conditions.
  • Inference harnesses for latency and throughput regression detection under load.
  • Tuning workflow to identify bottlenecks and validate improvements with repeatable runs.

Examples from FuZeCP are shown below.

Production readiness

  • Readiness checks before services report ready, CUDA availability, tokenizer sanity, configuration loading, and tensor loader probes.
  • Cache-awareness and correctness testing plans to prevent silent degradation.
  • Guardrails, observability hooks, and incident learning loops for diagnosable behavior.

Designed to keep production behavior predictable and diagnosable.

Operations you can measure
Operations you can measure: TTFT, throughput, queue delay, routing traces, and exportable telemetry. (From the briefing deck.)

Perimeter-first control model

Tenancy

Single-tenant FuZeCLOUD or on-prem FuZeBOX. No shared control plane.

Adaptive routing

RRLM routing optimizes quality, latency, and cost, with an optional Q-learning policy loop.

RBAC context

Context assembly ties into RBAC so retrieval and memory are policy-correct per user and role.

Audit

Telemetry and audit trails stay inside the customer boundary by default.

Benchmark tuning
FuZeCP: benchmark and tuning workflows.
RRLM tracing
FuZeCP: routing trace visibility for debugging and auditability.
Model management
FuZeCP: model management and lifecycle visibility.
Transparent backend
FuZeCP: transparency between user experience and backend execution.
Build in the Factory View Architecture